A Closer Look

Transitional Planning: Is Guardianship the Answer?

Curious to learn more? Check out the related webinar in the Online Learning Center!

As individuals receiving special education services approach adulthood, their parents, teachers, medical professionals, and other caring adults often have concerns about the young person’s decision-making and ability to navigate the world. All too often, the first reaction is to seek guardianship or conservatorship for the young person. While well intended, inappropriate use of guardianship can cause harm because of:

  • Loss of civil rights, including the rights to vote, marry, own property, make medical decisions, decide where to live, and choose with whom to spend time.
  • Negative impacts on both physical and mental health, including feelings of well-being.
  • Increased passivity.
  • Ongoing involvement with the court as most states require annual accounting and well-being reports.

Alternatives to Guardianship

Fortunately, there are many less restrictive alternatives for the young person and their supporters to explore. These are formal or informal options that allow a person to have their personal or financial needs met without the need for a guardian or conservator. These may be used alone or in combination, and they may involve a limited guardianship or conservatorship. These options should be based on the individual’s specific circumstances. The education, medical, public benefits, and legal systems all have different definitions of and standards for capacity. It is necessary to consider capacity in each specific area, including the capacity to make medical, educational, financial, and personal decisions. Personal decisions include relationships, living arrangements, and social activities. Capacity can be situational and can vary in degree.

Individualized Support

The specific capacity concerns should be considered in the context of the individual’s strengths and capabilities. These should drive decisions about how to help support the young person. Below are examples of ways to support a young person in specific capacity areas.

  • Personal decision making: Provide supported decision-making, in which one or more individuals are designated by the young person to help them make their own decisions. In some states, there is legal recognition of supported decision-making agreements.
  • Managing money, other assets, or public benefits: Establish a power of attorney, use an SSA Representative Payee, set up Achieving Better Life Experiences (ABLE) accounts, use special needs trusts, and take advantage of banking services including direct deposits, automatic payments, and money managers.
  • Medical or mental health care: Provide supported decision-making, surrogate decision-making, and the use of advance directives including a medical and a mental health power of attorney.

The familiar Individualized Education Program (IEP) can help ensure that family members or other supporters stay involved in educational decisions, even after the age of 18. As capacity changes, adjustments to the supports will be needed.

There are a number of resources available, including the Finding the Right Fit course, available for free from the National Center for State Courts. Information on supported decision making can be found at the Center for Legal Representation. Other useful resources can be found at 100 Ways to Use Supported Decision Making and the South Carolina Supported Decision Making Project.

All of us need the support of people around us to navigate the many decisions we make. For many young people with disabilities, this support can be provided in ways that maintain their autonomy and rights.

About the Author

Diane, Megan, and Nisa
Diane Robinson, PhD, is a Principal Court Research Associate in the Research Division of the National Center for State Courts (NCSC). Since joining the NCSC in 2019, she has led the Center for Elders and the Courts with projects including the Conservatorship Accountability Project, the Guardianship Judicial Response Protocol, Rapid Response Financial Monitoring, Elder Justice Innovation Grants, and the Guardianship and Technology project. She also works in data governance, including data collection, data quality, use of data, and data sharing. She earned her PhD at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, her MS in Education at Indiana University, and her BA at Texas A&M University. She was previously the Director of Research and Justice Statistics for the Arkansas court system and was also the state director for the Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) program in Arkansas. Diane served for 6 years on the school board of the Conway Public Schools.

Megan Rusciano, JD, is a Senior Staff Attorney at The Arc of the United States, where she works to advance the rights of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Rusciano was formerly Managing Attorney of the Developmental Disabilities and Health Care Team at Disability Rights Maryland, Maryland’s federally designated Protection & Advocacy agency for people with disabilities. She founded and chaired Maryland’s Cross-Disability Supported Decision-Making Coalition, was faculty for Maryland Judiciary’s training for court-appointed attorneys in guardianship proceedings, and was selected to participate in a group tasked with updating Maryland’s rule of professional conduct for attorneys who represent clients with diminished capacity. Rusciano received The Arc Maryland’s Outstanding Advocate of the Year award in 2022 and was recognized as a Thomson Reuter’s Maryland Rising Star in 2023.

Nisa C. Subasinghe, Esq., is the Domestic & Guardianship Program Manager at the Maryland Judiciary’s Administrative Office of the Courts. Her work focuses on issues affecting children and families who come through the court system. She staffs Maryland Judicial Council’s Domestic Law Committee, specifically its Court Process, Custody Evaluator Training & Standards, Domestic Forms, Family Law Bench Book, Guardianship & Vulnerable Adults, Legislative, LGBTQ+ Family Law, and Special Status workgroups. She also provides training and technical assistance to judges, magistrates, court staff, attorneys, and others who handle domestic, guardianship, and related matters, and she has lead staff responsibility for the judiciary’s guardianship reform efforts. Prior to joining the Maryland Judiciary, Ms. Subasinghe served as a victim rights advocate. She is a graduate of The Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law.