Walnut Tart
- Total Time
- 40 minutes (with premade crust), plus chilling
- Rating
- Notes
- Read community notes
Advertisement
Ingredients
- 1stick butter, more for smearing foil
- 1unbaked pastry shell in a 9-inch pie pan
- 1½cups sugar
- ½cup cream
- 2½cups roughly chopped walnuts (there should be large chunks)
- Salt to taste
Preparation
- Step 1
Preheat oven to 400 degrees. Tear off a piece of foil twice as large as crust. Fold it in half and smear it with butter; lay buttered side onto crust. Weight foil with a pile of dried beans or rice (these can be reused for this purpose), pie weights, or a tight-fitting ovenproof skillet or saucepan — anything that will sit flat on the surface. Bake 12 minutes, then remove foil and continue to bake at 350 degrees, until crust is a beautiful shade of brown, another few minutes. Remove and let cool on a rack while you prepare filling.
- Step 2
Put sugar in a heavy 6- or 8-inch saucepan or deep skillet with a tablespoon of water and turn heat to medium. Cook, gently shaking pan occasionally, until sugar melts; then cook, stirring occasionally and scraping sides with a heat-proof flexible spatula, until mixture turns golden.
- Step 3
Turn heat to low, then carefully add butter and cream. Cook, stirring constantly, until butter melts and mixture is uniform. Stir in walnuts and a large pinch of salt if you like, then spread on crust. Refrigerate for about an hour, then sprinkle with a little more salt and serve.
Private Notes
Cooking Notes
In the original published recipe, Mark Bittman suggested a layer of chocolate under the walnut filling. We've used melted bittersweet chocolate to great success.
This is good -- but very, very, very sweet. You should be warned, unless you've got the sickest sweet tooth ever, that this will be too sweet. I love toffee and walnuts, basically this recipe if you heat it more, and this was still too sweet for me. This is like, crack pie. You can feel the sugar in one bite. Actually, it's delicious for one bite. But that's all I can eat before I feel like I'm having a sugar overdose.
Anyone who knows how to make caramel knows that 1 TBSP of water is unnecessary, though it does help beginners. Adding 5 TBSP water makes the sugar dissolve too quickly and depending on the heat, the pan, and stirring or lack thereof, the sugar mixture may crystallize rather than turning into a smooth, silky caramel. The water is released as steam, and adding 5 TBSP of water slows the cooking process for the caramel.
I'm surprised that the New York Times, with its international audience, allows a recipe to specify a 'stick of butter'. What's so hard about putting '4 oz'? At least we can convert that to metric.
Delicious! I recommend googling how to make caramel before you start. I hadn't made caramel for several years and it took me three tries to get it right. It's tricky but finally very low heat and patience did the trick. and it was soooo worth it!
Absolutely delicious. Infinitely better than pecan (and I love pecan). As others have said, don't put the water in the sugar... it will just slow down the caramel process. This is, however, very rich, and tiny servings (or possibly tiny tarts) would certainly be enough.
The one tablespoon of water is plenty. It just takes some patience. I think I would toast the walnuts next time; the pie has too much of a raw walnut flavor. I would also reduce the walnuts by half a cup. It is very sweet to be sure.
Better with some chocolate and whipped cream!
The sugar melting is tricky. Don’t stir it too much but if you do, like I did, be patient and it might come around. This was a bit too much filling for my small crust so it overflowed. We are going to eat it burnt sugar soggy crust and all and still be very happy.
I’m a newbie to making caramel and had to try 4 times to get it right. The first 3 times I used 1 Tbsp of water at varying temps (low to medium) and varying degrees of stirring (none to too much) and each time it crystallized. The 4th try I didn’t use any water and used low-medium heat and it finally worked (no water, no crystallization).
This gets rave reviews every time I make it. Yes it’s sweet but definitely not cloying. Has become a go to recipe for company or to take to someone else’s house for dinner. I think adding chocolate might be too much and as everyone who has had this tart loves it as is, I am inclined to keep making it without chocolate …. I do reduce the sugar a bit… but. It much.
This is fabulous wow. I used a butter-lard crust, which I baked at 375 for 20 mins with weights, 20 mins pricked without. 1/2 tsp fine sea salt with walnuts (325 grams), Maldon to garnish.
Super easy to do. Delicious. I have very limited skills in the kitchen. I am learning during this new corona virus pandemic. I also did the crust by myself. It is called Pate Brisee and it is also easy to do it. U can find the recipe everywhere. To get a "beautiful shade of brown" I need liked 10-12min after remove the foil. After one hour in the fridge it was great. After 6 hours in the fridge It was heavenly. The walnut floats over the caramel, so you have 3 layers: nuts, caramel and crust
Absolutely delicious. Infinitely better than pecan (and I love pecan). As others have said, don't put the water in the sugar... it will just slow down the caramel process. This is, however, very rich, and tiny servings (or possibly tiny tarts) would certainly be enough.
In the original recipe, Mark Bittman suggested a layer of chocolate under the walnut filling. I made this with two minor changes. I toasted the walnuts first in oven. The second thing was an accident when I turned away from caramel for a moment and it went past golden to copper color. It turned the slightest "burnt" flavor, which was fantastic. This tart was a HIT at the Thanksgiving dinner table. It is very rich, so thinking of making it in a square pan and cutting it into squares.
Delicious! I recommend googling how to make caramel before you start. I hadn't made caramel for several years and it took me three tries to get it right. It's tricky but finally very low heat and patience did the trick. and it was soooo worth it!
This is good -- but very, very, very sweet. You should be warned, unless you've got the sickest sweet tooth ever, that this will be too sweet. I love toffee and walnuts, basically this recipe if you heat it more, and this was still too sweet for me. This is like, crack pie. You can feel the sugar in one bite. Actually, it's delicious for one bite. But that's all I can eat before I feel like I'm having a sugar overdose.
Thanks for the warning. I think I'll make individual one- or two-bite tartlets instead.
Sugar doesn't melt with 1 Tb. Tried twice. Second time, tried 5 Tb and did melt.
Anyone who knows how to make caramel knows that 1 TBSP of water is unnecessary, though it does help beginners. Adding 5 TBSP water makes the sugar dissolve too quickly and depending on the heat, the pan, and stirring or lack thereof, the sugar mixture may crystallize rather than turning into a smooth, silky caramel. The water is released as steam, and adding 5 TBSP of water slows the cooking process for the caramel.
I'm surprised that the New York Times, with its international audience, allows a recipe to specify a 'stick of butter'. What's so hard about putting '4 oz'? At least we can convert that to metric.
In the original published recipe, Mark Bittman suggested a layer of chocolate under the walnut filling. We've used melted bittersweet chocolate to great success.
Advertisement