With a week left until Inauguration Day, only one thing appears certain: Joe Biden will take the oath of office, his hand resting on a family Bible from the 1890s, and become the next president of the United States.
Almost every other detail of that day, however, is in flux, thanks to the coronavirus pandemic, the near-inevitable impeachment of his predecessor, and the attempted insurrection on the very spot where Biden will likely be sworn in.
After last week’s failed insurrection at the U.S. Capitol by supporters of President Donald Trump’s attempts to cling to power, there is growing concern among security professionals, law enforcement, and transition officials that next week’s planned presidential inauguration and the events around it could bring hundreds of would-be plotters to the nation’s capital.
“You haven’t really had this level of potentially violent domestic terrorism in the United States, certainly in my lifetime,” said Roderick Jones, a security expert and executive chair of Concentric Advisors, a private security firm. “This isn’t al Qaeda directing attackers—individuals or small groups of individuals taking that motivation, and then using these tactics themselves. It makes it really, really challenging for the security and intelligence authorities to get on top of it, because there’s no organization to infiltrate.”
Presidential inaugurations are always a balancing act between security and spectacle—part constitutionally prescribed transfer of power, part Super Bowl halftime show—and the Biden transition has long acknowledged that between the coronavirus pandemic and the threat of “weird shit” from Trump’s supporters, next week’s swearing-in was always going to be a break from the traditional pomp.
But last Wednesday’s would-be putsch, which left five people dead and came much closer to threatening the lives of senior government officials than was initially thought, has revealed deep security concerns—and promises of additional waves of protests in the coming week have spooked security experts and members of Congress alike.
“We have grave concerns about ongoing and violent threats to our democracy,” six top lawmakers said in a statement following a briefing by Justice Department officials on Tuesday outlining the current investigation into the attack on the Capitol. The members of Congress, who head the U.S. House of Representatives Armed Services, Homeland Security, Intelligence, Justice, and Oversight committees, wrote that “it is clear that more must be done to preempt, penetrate, and prevent deadly and seditious assaults by domestic violent extremists in the days ahead,” particularly with Biden’s inauguration now just one week away.
But the intensity of the violence last week—and Trump’s continued insistence that the speech he gave that incited a mob of thousands of supporters to attack the Capitol was “totally appropriate”—may have changed the calculus for planning out so-called “free speech zones” near inaugural festivities.
“A concerning trend that I think we’ve seen over the past four years is the steady normalization of political violence. Things that I was very concerned about at the beginning of the Trump administration have kind of come to fruition,” Cassie Miller, a senior research analyst at the Southern Poverty Law Center, told The Daily Beast. “What we saw was this attempt to basically normalize the idea that you can use intimidation and threats and violence to deal with the people who you consider your political enemies. Those groups were really looking for recognition from Trump, and endorsement of their tactics, and they have really gotten that towards the end of his administration.”
Jones, who served in London’s Metropolitan Police Special Branch and was once a protective agent for a senior cabinet minister, said that he has great confidence in the Secret Service protecting the actual inauguration events like the traditional walk along parts of the parade route. Instead, the numerous planned protest events across Washington—and in state capitals around the country—present the kind of wide-ranging list of targets that are a lot harder to defend.
“I think if I’m a domestic extremist, while that walk is going on for example, there’s lots of other softer targets in the capital where I could make my point, and be more successful,” Jones said. The evident lack of coordination between agencies ahead of the riot at the Capitol, Jones added, is particularly worrying.
“The thing that still strikes me as odd is the lack of coordination of security efforts between the D.C. police, DHS, that remains unclear to me,” Jones said. “You can see from the events of last week that the lack of coordination makes this all very difficult. Attackers can get through gaps when the coordination is unclear, and having the acting head of the DHS resign just before the whole thing doesn’t help with that.”
These lingering concerns—to say nothing of the pandemic that is on track to have claimed nearly 400,000 American lives by Inauguration Day—obviously put a damper on what is supposed to be the brightest day of an incoming president’s political life. But those close to the president-elect told The Daily Beast that if there is any recognition of the bittersweetness of finally taking the oath of office—his hand likely resting upon a five-inch-thick Bible that has been in his family since the 19th century and on which he was sworn into office as a U.S. senator and as vice president—under such trying circumstances, Biden has not expressed it.
On Monday, Biden reassured reporters that he is “not afraid to take the oath outside” when he’s sworn into office next Wednesday.
A few hours later, members of Congress were reminded during a security briefing by U.S. Capitol Police that, if they desire, they can be reimbursed for the purchase of a bulletproof vest.