This site uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Sensitivity of Arctic clouds to ice microphysical processes in the NorESM2 climate model

Georgia Sotiropoulou 1ICE-HT, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), Patras, Greece
3Laboratory of Atmospheric Processes and their Impacts (LAPI), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Georgia Sotiropoulou in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Anna Lewinschal 2Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University & Bolin Center for Climate Research, Sweden

Search for other papers by Anna Lewinschal in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Paraskevi Georgakaki 3Laboratory of Atmospheric Processes and their Impacts (LAPI), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Paraskevi Georgakaki in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Vaughan Phillips 4Department of Physical Geography, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden

Search for other papers by Vaughan Phillips in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sachin Patade 4Department of Physical Geography, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden

Search for other papers by Sachin Patade in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Annica M. L. Ekman 2Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University & Bolin Center for Climate Research, Sweden

Search for other papers by Annica M. L. Ekman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Athanasios Nenes 1ICE-HT, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), Patras, Greece
3Laboratory of Atmospheric Processes and their Impacts (LAPI), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Athanasios Nenes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

Abstract

Ice formation remains one of the most poorly represented microphysical processes in climate models. While primary ice production (PIP) parameterizations are known to have a large influence on the modeled cloud properties, the representation of secondary ice production (SIP) is incomplete and its corresponding impact is therefore largely unquantified. Furthermore, ice aggregation is another important process for the total cloud ice budget, which also remains largely unconstrained. In this study we examine the impact of PIP, SIP and ice aggregation on Arctic clouds, using the Norwegian Earth System model version 2 (NorESM2). Simulations with both prognostic and diagnostic PIP show that heterogeneous freezing alone cannot reproduce the observed cloud ice content. The implementation of missing SIP mechanisms (collisional break-up, drop-shattering and sublimation break-up) in NorESM2 improves the modeled ice properties, while improvements in liquid content occur only in simulations with prognostic PIP. However, results are sensitive to the description of collisional break-up. This mechanism, which dominates SIP in the examined conditions, is very sensitive to the treatment of the sublimation correction factor, a poorly-constrained parameter that is included in the utilized parameterization. Finally, variations in ice aggregation treatment can also significantly impact cloud properties, mainly through its impact on collisional break-up efficiency. Overall, enhancement in ice production though the addition of SIP mechanisms and the reduction of ice aggregation (in line with radar observations of shallow Arctic clouds) result in enhanced cloud cover and decreased TOA radiation biases, compared to satellite measurements, especially during the cold months.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This is an Author Accepted Manuscript distributed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Currently at the Department of Physics, Sector of Environmental Physics & Meteorology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

Corresponding author: [email protected], [email protected]

Abstract

Ice formation remains one of the most poorly represented microphysical processes in climate models. While primary ice production (PIP) parameterizations are known to have a large influence on the modeled cloud properties, the representation of secondary ice production (SIP) is incomplete and its corresponding impact is therefore largely unquantified. Furthermore, ice aggregation is another important process for the total cloud ice budget, which also remains largely unconstrained. In this study we examine the impact of PIP, SIP and ice aggregation on Arctic clouds, using the Norwegian Earth System model version 2 (NorESM2). Simulations with both prognostic and diagnostic PIP show that heterogeneous freezing alone cannot reproduce the observed cloud ice content. The implementation of missing SIP mechanisms (collisional break-up, drop-shattering and sublimation break-up) in NorESM2 improves the modeled ice properties, while improvements in liquid content occur only in simulations with prognostic PIP. However, results are sensitive to the description of collisional break-up. This mechanism, which dominates SIP in the examined conditions, is very sensitive to the treatment of the sublimation correction factor, a poorly-constrained parameter that is included in the utilized parameterization. Finally, variations in ice aggregation treatment can also significantly impact cloud properties, mainly through its impact on collisional break-up efficiency. Overall, enhancement in ice production though the addition of SIP mechanisms and the reduction of ice aggregation (in line with radar observations of shallow Arctic clouds) result in enhanced cloud cover and decreased TOA radiation biases, compared to satellite measurements, especially during the cold months.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This is an Author Accepted Manuscript distributed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Currently at the Department of Physics, Sector of Environmental Physics & Meteorology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

Corresponding author: [email protected], [email protected]
Save