Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.

Fashion Review

Bottega Veneta Gets a New Look

The verdict is in on Daniel Lee’s first runway collection.

Image
Bottega Veneta, fall 2019Credit...Valerio Mezzanotti for The New York Times

MILAN — When Phoebe Philo left Celine just before Christmas in 2017, an entire swath of female shoppers went into mourning. The designer who had given them a wardrobe that spoke to their minds and ambitions — that provided intelligent comfort without glitz, that swaddled in a most subtle way — was stepping down. When she was replaced by Hedi Slimane, fetishizer of the skinny suit and truncated hemline and dash of rock star desiccation, they despaired. Where would they shop?

Then Bottega Veneta, the Italian brand that had been defined for 17 years by Tomas Maier, the insistence that your own initials are enough and its woven intrecciato leather bags, announced that Mr. Maier would be leaving the company and would be replaced by Daniel Lee, a young British designer most people had never heard of. What they knew, however, was this: Mr. Lee’s previous job has been as the head of ready-to-wear at Celine under Ms. Philo.

Wait! Maybe more was going on than boring designer musical chairs.

Was Bottega going to reimagine itself as the brand for loyalists of what has become colloquially known as Old Celine? Were they going to have a new place to shop? Was Mr. Lee’s aesthetic also — maybe? — a Philo-phile aesthetic? If so, was that, in fact, a good thing or had its time come and gone (has it been idealized in retrospect)?

Image
Bottega Veneta, fall 2019Credit...Valerio Mezzanotti for The New York Times

On Friday morning in Milan, as Mr. Lee unveiled his first runway collection for the brand, everyone got to find out.

And the answer is … a qualified yes.

Though clearly in the vernacular of Old Celine as well as the house he has just joined, Mr. Lee’s Bottega was tougher, cooler, less interested in tête-à-têtes in an arty corner, and less well-behaved than either past brand. That’s a good thing.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT