Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.

5 CANADIAN LOAN UNITS ARE SEIZED

5 CANADIAN LOAN UNITS ARE SEIZED
Credit...The New York Times Archives
See the article in its original context from
January 10, 1983, Section D, Page 1Buy Reprints
TimesMachine is an exclusive benefit for home delivery and digital subscribers.
About the Archive
This is a digitized version of an article from The Times’s print archive, before the start of online publication in 1996. To preserve these articles as they originally appeared, The Times does not alter, edit or update them.
Occasionally the digitization process introduces transcription errors or other problems; we are continuing to work to improve these archived versions.

Federal and provincial authorities have taken control of more than $2 billion (Canadian) of assets in three trust companies and two mortgage companies in a surprise move to protect depositors' interests.

Robert Elgie, minister of consumer and commercial relations in the Ontario Government, using emergency legislation passed Dec. 21, ordered the provincial registrar of loan and trust companies Friday to take control of Greymac Trust, Seaway Trust and Crown Trust.

The companies are the subject of a Government inquiry into their role in financing a series of transactions involving the sale of 11,000 apartments formerly owned by Cadillac Fairview, an international property developer.

Following the Ontario action, Paul Cosgrove, the federal minister for consumer and corporate relations, ordered the federal superintendent of insurance to seize the assets of two related companies, the Greymac Mortgage Corporation and the Seaway Mortgage Corporation. Assets Questioned

In a statement, Mr. Cosgrove said the action was taken under the Loan Companies Act, which gives the superintendent authority to take control of a company he believes has assets ''not satisfactorily accounted for and that other circumstances so warrant.''

Mr. Elgie said in a statement that he had ordered the takeover of the three trust companies because in each case, ''there exists a practice of or a state of affairs that is or may be prejudicial to the public interest or to the depositors, creditors or shareholders.''


Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT