Supported by
NOT RELEASED FROM HIS DEBTS; PETITION OF ANTHONY W. DIMOCK DENIED IN KINGSTON. Non-Residence and Insufficient Number of Consents of Creditors the Reasons of the Court.
See the article in its original context from
March 19, 1895, Page 9Buy Reprints
March 19, 1895, Page 9Buy Reprints
TimesMachine is an exclusive benefit for home delivery and digital subscribers.
Full text is unavailable for this digitized archive article. Subscribers may view the full text of this article in its original form through TimesMachine.
KINGSTON, N.Y., March l8. -- On the ground of non-residence and because an insufficient number of consents of creditors were obtained as required by the statute, Judge Clearwater has denied the application of Anthony W. Dimock to be discharged of his debts. The decision was filed this afternoon. View Full Article in Timesmachine »
Advertisement