Supported by
VIADUCT OR UNDERGROUND?
See the article in its original context from
March 14, 1895, Page 4Buy Reprints
March 14, 1895, Page 4Buy Reprints
TimesMachine is an exclusive benefit for home delivery and digital subscribers.
Full text is unavailable for this digitized archive article. Subscribers may view the full text of this article in its original form through TimesMachine.
There seems to be much force in the objection made by Boulevard property owners to the construction of the rapid-transit road upon a viaduct for a mile, from Ninety-second to One Hundred and Twelfth Street. As no answer was made to the statement that the purpose was not to avoid any engineering difficulty, but to save about $1,250,000 in the cost of construction, we presume the statement was substantially correct. View Full Article in Timesmachine »
Advertisement