Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods
- PMID: 9595616
- DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<857::aid-sim777>3.0.co;2-e
Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods
Abstract
Simple interval estimate methods for proportions exhibit poor coverage and can produce evidently inappropriate intervals. Criteria appropriate to the evaluation of various proposed methods include: closeness of the achieved coverage probability to its nominal value; whether intervals are located too close to or too distant from the middle of the scale; expected interval width; avoidance of aberrations such as limits outside [0,1] or zero width intervals; and ease of use, whether by tables, software or formulae. Seven methods for the single proportion are evaluated on 96,000 parameter space points. Intervals based on tail areas and the simpler score methods are recommended for use. In each case, methods are available that aim to align either the minimum or the mean coverage with the nominal 1 -alpha.
Comment in
-
Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods by Robert G. Newcombe, Statistics in Medicine 1998; 17:857-872.Stat Med. 2005 Nov 15;24(21):3383-4. doi: 10.1002/sim.2164. Stat Med. 2005. PMID: 16206245 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Confidence intervals for the difference between independent binomial proportions: comparison using a graphical approach and moving averages.Pharm Stat. 2014 Sep-Oct;13(5):294-308. doi: 10.1002/pst.1631. Epub 2014 Aug 27. Pharm Stat. 2014. PMID: 25163425
-
Statistics, probability, significance, likelihood: words mean what we define them to mean.J Physiol. 2011 Aug 15;589(Pt 16):3901-4. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.215103. J Physiol. 2011. PMID: 21844004 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Comparison of means and proportions using confidence intervals.J Paediatr Child Health. 2001 Dec;37(6):583-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2001.00771.x. J Paediatr Child Health. 2001. PMID: 11903840 Review. No abstract available.
-
Improved confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions based on paired data.Stat Med. 1998 Nov 30;17(22):2635-50. Stat Med. 1998. PMID: 9839354
-
Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods.Stat Med. 1998 Apr 30;17(8):873-90. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<873::aid-sim779>3.0.co;2-i. Stat Med. 1998. PMID: 9595617
Cited by
-
The effect of artificial saliva on the control of dry mouth: a semi-experimental study on COVID-19 patients under Non-invasive mechanical ventilation.BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 31;24(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04386-4. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 38822326 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Five years later, with double the demographic data, naked mole-rat mortality rates continue to defy Gompertzian laws by not increasing with age.Geroscience. 2024 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s11357-024-01201-4. Online ahead of print. Geroscience. 2024. PMID: 38773057
-
Post-anesthesia care unit hypotension in low-risk patients recovering from non-cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study.J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 May 17. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01176-9. Online ahead of print. J Clin Monit Comput. 2024. PMID: 38758404
-
How did the use of the social marketing approach in Egyptian communities succeed in improving breastfeeding practices and infants' growth?BMC Public Health. 2024 May 13;24(1):1298. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18469-y. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38741049 Free PMC article.
-
Contacts with primary and secondary healthcare before suicide by those under the care of mental health services: case-control, whole-population-based study using person-level linked routine data in Wales, UK during 2000-2015.BJPsych Open. 2024 May 10;10(3):e108. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.23. BJPsych Open. 2024. PMID: 38725371 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources