Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 1:296:567-576.
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.09.098. Epub 2021 Oct 1.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020

Eric Robinson  1 , Angelina R Sutin  2 , Michael Daly  2 , Andrew Jones  3
Affiliations
Review

A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020

Eric Robinson et al. J Affect Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Increases in mental health problems have been observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objectives were to examine the extent to which mental health symptoms changed during the pandemic in 2020, whether changes were persistent or short lived, and if changes were symptom specific.

Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies examining changes in mental health among the same group of participants before vs. during the pandemic in 2020.

Results: Sixty-five studies were included. Compared to pre-pandemic outbreak, there was an overall increase in mental health symptoms observed during March-April 2020 (SMC = .102 [95% CI: .026 to .192]) that significantly declined over time and became non-significant (May-July SMC = .067 [95% CI: -.022 to .157]. Compared to measures of anxiety (SMC = 0.13, p = 0.02) and general mental health (SMC = -.03, p = 0.65), increases in depression and mood disorder symptoms tended to be larger and remained significantly elevated in May-July [0.20, 95% CI: .099 to .302]. In primary analyses increases were most pronounced among samples with physical health conditions and there was no evidence of any change in symptoms among samples with a pre-existing mental health condition.

Limitations: There was a high degree of unexplained heterogeneity observed (I2s > 90%), indicating that change in mental health was highly variable across samples.

Conclusions: There was a small increase in mental health symptoms soon after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic that decreased and was comparable to pre-pandemic levels by mid-2020 among most population sub-groups and symptom types.

Keywords: Anxiety; COVID-19; Coronavirus; Depression; Longitudinal; Mental health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf . All authors report no conflicts of interest. ER has previously received funding from the American Beverage Association and Unilever for projects unrelated to the present research.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1.
Study search and inclusion flow chart ‘Not a research report’ indicates that a manuscript was ineligible as it did not report on an empirical study. Excluded as unable to include in meta-analysis (N = 1) was due to authors not providing the required missing statistical information to compute effect size after having been contacted.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2.
Forest plot of effect sizes from studies of depression, general mental health and anxiety symptoms with lower risk of bias. Analyses of more homogenous collection of studies (depression, anxiety, general mental health measures only) that were of lower risk of bias (used representative sampling, did not report inconsistent mode of survey delivery, reported no conflicts of interest) of ∼27,736 participants, SMC = .100 [95% CI: .033 to .166], z = 2.95, p = .003, I2 = 98.0%). General (general population sample), MH (sample with pre-existing mental health condition).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3.
Forest plot of effect sizes for exceeding questionnaire cut offs. General MH (measure of general mental health functioning). Marginal Odds Ratio = 1.31 [95% CI: 1.10 to 1.55], z = 3.18, p = .001, I2 = 93.2%).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ahrens K.F., Neumann R.J., Kollmann B., Plichta M.M., Lieb K., Tüscher O., et al. Differential impact of COVID-related lockdown on mental health in Germany. World Psychiatry. 2021;20(1):140. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aknin L., De Neve J.E., Dunn E., Fancourt D., Goldberg E., Helliwell J., et al. Mental health during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: a review and recommendations for moving forward. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2021 in press. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amaral V.T., et al. Home confinement during COVID-19 pandemic reduced physical activity but not health-related quality of life in previously active older women. MedRxiv Pre-print. 2020
    1. Antonis A. The long term mental health impact of covid-19 must not be ignored. BMJ. 2020 https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/05/05/the-long-term-mental-health-impact-...
    1. Arora T., Grey I., Östlundh L., Lam K.B.H., Omar O.M., Arnone D. The prevalence of psychological consequences of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J. Health Psychol. 2020 1359105320966639. - PubMed