Does a single session of reading literary fiction prime enhanced mentalising performance? Four replication experiments of Kidd and Castano (2013)
- PMID: 28095740
- DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1279591
Does a single session of reading literary fiction prime enhanced mentalising performance? Four replication experiments of Kidd and Castano (2013)
Abstract
Prior experiments indicated that reading literary fiction improves mentalising performance relative to reading popular fiction, non-fiction, or not reading. However, the experiments had relatively small sample sizes and hence low statistical power. To address this limitation, the present authors conducted four high-powered replication experiments (combined N = 1006) testing the causal impact of reading literary fiction on mentalising. Relative to the original research, the present experiments used the same literary texts in the reading manipulation; the same mentalising task; and the same kind of participant samples. Moreover, one experiment was pre-registered as a direct replication. In none of the experiments did reading literary fiction have any effect on mentalising relative to control conditions. The results replicate earlier findings that familiarity with fiction is positively correlated with mentalising. Taken together, the present findings call into question whether a single session of reading fiction leads to immediate improvements in mentalising.
Keywords: Reading; literary fiction; literature; mentalising; theory of mind.
Similar articles
-
No support for the claim that literary fiction uniquely and immediately improves theory of mind: A reply to Kidd and Castano's commentary on Panero et al. (2016).J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Mar;112(3):e5-e8. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000079. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28221090
-
"Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication": Correction to Panero et al. (2016).J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov;111(5):e55. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000067. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016. PMID: 27762576
-
Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov;111(5):e46-e54. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000064. Epub 2016 Sep 19. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016. PMID: 27642659
-
Fiction: Simulation of Social Worlds.Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Aug;20(8):618-628. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 19. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016. PMID: 27449184 Review.
-
Emotion and narrative fiction: Interactive influences before, during, and after reading.Cogn Emot. 2011 Aug;25(5):818-33. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.515151. Epub 2011 May 24. Cogn Emot. 2011. PMID: 21824023 Review.
Cited by
-
The effects of reading and watching fiction on the development of social cognition: a systematic review.Dement Neuropsychol. 2023 Dec 11;17:e20230066. doi: 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2023-0066. eCollection 2023. Dement Neuropsychol. 2023. PMID: 38089170 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is reading fiction associated with a higher mind-reading ability? Two conceptual replication studies in Japan.PLoS One. 2023 Jun 22;18(6):e0287542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287542. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37347739 Free PMC article.
-
Adolescent leisure reading and its longitudinal association with prosocial behavior and social adjustment.Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 15;13(1):9695. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35346-7. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37322024 Free PMC article.
-
Stories in Action.Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2022 Dec;23(3):99-141. doi: 10.1177/15291006231161337. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2022. PMID: 37161872 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the Relationship Between Fiction Reading and Emotion Recognition.Affect Sci. 2021 Apr 20;2(2):178-186. doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00034-0. eCollection 2021 Jun. Affect Sci. 2021. PMID: 36043173 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
