Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jul;20(4):488-95.
doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181a819a1.

Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies

Enrique F Schisterman  1 , Stephen R Cole, Robert W Platt
Affiliations

Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies

Enrique F Schisterman et al. Epidemiology. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

Overadjustment is defined inconsistently. This term is meant to describe control (eg, by regression adjustment, stratification, or restriction) for a variable that either increases net bias or decreases precision without affecting bias. We define overadjustment bias as control for an intermediate variable (or a descending proxy for an intermediate variable) on a causal path from exposure to outcome. We define unnecessary adjustment as control for a variable that does not affect bias of the causal relation between exposure and outcome but may affect its precision. We use causal diagrams and an empirical example (the effect of maternal smoking on neonatal mortality) to illustrate and clarify the definition of overadjustment bias, and to distinguish overadjustment bias from unnecessary adjustment. Using simulations, we quantify the amount of bias associated with overadjustment. Moreover, we show that this bias is based on a different causal structure from confounding or selection biases. Overadjustment bias is not a finite sample bias, while inefficiencies due to control for unnecessary variables are a function of sample size.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Bias estimating the total effect of exposure of interest E on the outcome D as a function of the direct effect of the unmeasured intermediate (U) variable (βD) on the outcome D and the direct effect of the unmeasured intermediate (U) variable on another independent descendent (M) of U denoted by βM.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Large and small sample size properties on Monte Carlo relative bias and variance of total effect estimates after adjusting for unnecessary variables.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Greenland S, Morgenstern H. Confounding in health research. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:189–212. - PubMed
    1. Hernan MA, Alonso A, Logroscino G. Cigarette smoking and dementia: potential selection bias in the elderly. Epidemiology. 2008;19:448–450. - PubMed
    1. Hernan MA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Robins JM. A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology. 2004;15:615–625. - PubMed
    1. Porta M, editor. A Dictionary of Epidemiology. 5th edn. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
    1. Breslow N. Design and analysis of case control studies. Annu Rev Public Health. 1982;3:29–54. - PubMed

Publication types