Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework
- PMID: 10474547
- PMCID: PMC1508772
- DOI: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322
Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework
Abstract
Progress in public health and community-based interventions has been hampered by the lack of a comprehensive evaluation framework appropriate to such programs. Multilevel interventions that incorporate policy, environmental, and individual components should be evaluated with measurements suited to their settings, goals, and purpose. In this commentary, the authors propose a model (termed the RE-AIM model) for evaluating public health interventions that assesses 5 dimensions: reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. These dimensions occur at multiple levels (e.g., individual, clinic or organization, community) and interact to determine the public health or population-based impact of a program or policy. The authors discuss issues in evaluating each of these dimensions and combining them to determine overall public health impact. Failure to adequately evaluate programs on all 5 dimensions can lead to a waste of resources, discontinuities between stages of research, and failure to improve public health to the limits of our capacity. The authors summarize strengths and limitations of the RE-AIM model and recommend areas for future research and application.
Similar articles
-
Fidelity to and comparative results across behavioral interventions evaluated through the RE-AIM framework: a systematic review.Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 8;4:155. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0141-0. Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26547687 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluating Policy, Systems, and Environmental Change Interventions: Lessons Learned From CDC's Prevention Research Centers.Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Oct 15;12:E174. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150281. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015. PMID: 26469947 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues.Health Educ Res. 2006 Oct;21(5):688-94. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl081. Epub 2006 Aug 31. Health Educ Res. 2006. PMID: 16945984
-
Assessment, program planning, and evaluation in population-based public health practice.J Public Health Manag Pract. 2002 Sep;8(5):30-43. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200209000-00005. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2002. PMID: 15156646
-
An integrative framework for community partnering to translate theory into effective health promotion strategy.Am J Health Promot. 2003 Nov-Dec;18(2):168-76. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-18.2.168. Am J Health Promot. 2003. PMID: 14621414 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of a virtual coaching program for women physicians on burnout, fulfillment, and self-valuation.BMC Psychol. 2024 Jun 5;12(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01763-0. BMC Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38840137 Free PMC article.
-
Community tuberculosis screening, testing and care, Uganda.Bull World Health Organ. 2024 Jun 1;102(6):400-409. doi: 10.2471/BLT.23.290641. Epub 2024 Apr 30. Bull World Health Organ. 2024. PMID: 38812802 Free PMC article.
-
Five recommendations to advance implementation science for humanitarian settings: the next frontier of humanitarian research.Confl Health. 2024 May 28;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13031-024-00597-2. Confl Health. 2024. PMID: 38807161 Free PMC article.
-
Usability and feasibility of the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) Toolkit in daily clinical practice: The BANANA study.NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2024 May 28;34(1):13. doi: 10.1038/s41533-024-00372-z. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2024. PMID: 38806496 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake among Tribal Communities: A Case Study on Program Implementation Experiences from Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh States, India.Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Apr 26;12(5):463. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12050463. Vaccines (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38793714 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources