TY - JOUR AU - Teodorowski, Piotr AU - Rodgers, Sarah E AU - Fleming, Kate AU - Frith, Lucy PY - 2022 DA - 2022/11/15 TI - Use of the Hashtag #DataSavesLives on Twitter: Exploratory and Thematic Analysis JO - J Med Internet Res SP - e38232 VL - 24 IS - 11 KW - consumer involvement KW - patient participation KW - stakeholder participation KW - social media KW - public engagement KW - campaign KW - big data KW - research KW - trust KW - tweets KW - Twitter KW - perception KW - usage KW - users KW - data sharing KW - ethics KW - community KW - hashtag AB - Background: “Data Saves Lives” is a public engagement campaign that highlights the benefits of big data research and aims to establish public trust for this emerging research area. Objective: This study explores how the hashtag #DataSavesLives is used on Twitter. We focused on the period when the UK government and its agencies adopted #DataSavesLives in an attempt to support their plans to set up a new database holding National Health Service (NHS) users’ medical data. Methods: Public tweets published between April 19 and July 15, 2021, using the hashtag #DataSavesLives were saved using NCapture for NVivo 12. All tweets were coded twice. First, each tweet was assigned a positive, neutral, or negative attitude toward the campaign. Second, inductive thematic analysis was conducted. The results of the thematic analysis were mapped under 3 models of public engagement: deficit, dialogue, and participatory. Results: Of 1026 unique tweets available for qualitative analysis, discussion around #DataSavesLives was largely positive (n=716, 69.8%) or neutral (n=276, 26.9%) toward the campaign with limited negative attitudes (n=34, 3.3%). Themes derived from the #DataSavesLives debate included ethical sharing, proactively engaging the public, coproducing knowledge with the public, harnessing potential, and gaining an understanding of big data research. The Twitter discourse was largely positive toward the campaign. The hashtag is predominantly used by similar-minded Twitter users to share information about big data projects and to spread positive messages about big data research when there are public controversies. The hashtag is generally used by organizations and people supportive of big data research. Tweet authors recognize that the public should be proactively engaged and involved in big data projects. The campaign remains UK centric. The results indicate that the communication around big data research is driven by the professional community and remains 1-way as members of the public rarely use the hashtag. Conclusions: The results demonstrate the potential of social media but draws attention to hashtag usage being generally confined to “Twitter bubbles”: groups of similar-minded Twitter users. SN - 1438-8871 UR - https://www.jmir.org/2022/11/e38232 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/38232 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36378518 DO - 10.2196/38232 ID - info:doi/10.2196/38232 ER -