Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 25;14(4):e076338.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076338.

Randomised multicentre effectiveness trial of rapid syndromic testing by panel assay in children presenting to European emergency departments with acute respiratory infections-trial protocol for the ADEQUATE Paediatric trial

Collaborators

Randomised multicentre effectiveness trial of rapid syndromic testing by panel assay in children presenting to European emergency departments with acute respiratory infections-trial protocol for the ADEQUATE Paediatric trial

ADEQUATE Paediatric Trial Group. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Syndromic panel assays, that is, using one test to simultaneously target multiple pathogens with overlapping signs and symptoms, have been integrated into routine paediatric care over the past decade, mainly for more severely ill and hospitalised patients. Their wider availability and short turnaround times open the possibility to apply them to non-hospitalised patients as well. In this context, it is important to trial how clinicians make use of pathogen detection data and if their early availability influences management decisions, particularly antibiotic use and hospitalisation.

Methods and analysis: Advanced Diagnostics for Enhanced QUality of Antibiotic prescription in respiratory Tract infections in Emergency rooms is an individually randomised, controlled, open-label effectiveness trial comparing the impact of a respiratory pathogen panel assay (BIOFIRE Respiratory Panel 2.1plus) used as a rapid syndromic test on nasopharyngeal swabs in addition to the standard of care versus standard of care alone. The trial will 1:1 randomise 520 participants under the age of 18 at 7 paediatric emergency departments in 5 European countries. Inclusion criteria for the trial consist of two sets, with the first describing respiratory tract infections in paediatric patients and the second describing the situation of potential management uncertainty in which test results may immediately affect management decisions. Enrolment started in July 2021 and is expected to be completed in early 2024. We will perform a two-sample t-test assuming a pooled variance estimate to compare the log-transformed mean time on antibiotic treatment (in hours) and number of days alive out of the hospital within 14 days after study enrolment between the control and intervention arms.

Ethics and dissemination: The trial protocol and materials were approved by research ethics committees in all participating countries. The respiratory pathogen panel assay is CE marked (assessed to meet European regulations) and FDA (United States Food and Drug Administration) cleared for diagnostic use. Participants and caregivers provide informed consent prior to study procedures commencing. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and at national and international conferences. Key messages will also be disseminated via press and social media where appropriate.

Trial registration number: NCT04781530.

Keywords: ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE; INFECTIOUS DISEASES; Paediatric A&E and ambulatory care; Respiratory infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Benjamin Hommel, Marie Tessonneau, Sophie Vandepitte, Jean-Louis Tissier, Florence Allantaz and Philippe Cleuziat are employees of bioMérieux, the manufacturer of the diagnostic tool under study in this trial. They were involved in the administration of the trial, provided resources and monitored the trial progress. They were not involved in the design or analysis of the trial. The other authors have no potential conflict of interest to disclose.

Similar articles

References

    1. O’Connor R, O’Doherty J, O’Regan A, et al. . Antibiotic use for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTI) in primary care; what factors affect prescribing and why is it important? A narrative review. Ir J Med Sci 2018;187:969–86. 10.1007/s11845-018-1774-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prat C, Lacoma A. Bacteria in the respiratory tract-how to treat? or do not treat? Int J Infect Dis 2016;51:113–22. 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.09.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Langer S, Horn J, Gottschick C, et al. . Symptom burden and factors associated with acute respiratory infections in the first two years of life-results from the Loewenkids cohort. Microorganisms 2022;10:111. 10.3390/microorganisms10010111 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cassini A, Högberg LD, Plachouras D, et al. . Attributable deaths and disability-adjusted life-years caused by infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the EU and the European economic area in 2015: a population-level Modelling analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2019;19:56–66. 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30605-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Naylor NR, Atun R, Zhu N, et al. . Estimating the burden of antimicrobial resistance: a systematic literature review. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2018;7:58. 10.1186/s13756-018-0336-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources