Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul 29;15(15):3373.
doi: 10.3390/nu15153373.

How to Keep the Balance between Red and Processed Meat Intake and Physical Activity Regarding Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

How to Keep the Balance between Red and Processed Meat Intake and Physical Activity Regarding Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis

Yi Wu et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Background: Non-communicable diseases have become a major threat to public health, with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and cancer being the top two causes of death each year.

Objective: Our objective is to evaluate the balanced association between the effect of red and processed meat intake on the risk of death and the effect of physical activity on the risk of mortality, where the risk of death includes all causes, CVDs, and cancers.

Methods: We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, for prospective studies reporting risk estimates for the association between the intake of red and processed meat, walking, and muscle-strengthening activity (MSA) and the risk of mortality from all causes, CVDs, and cancer. We extracted fully adjusted effect estimates from original studies and performed a summary analysis using the fixed and random-effect models.

Results: A conventional meta-analysis showed that red meat and processed meat were positively associated with the risk of mortality, and daily steps and MSA were negatively associated with the risk of death. Further analysis of the dose-response relationship showed that a risk reduction (20%) from 39.5 min/week of MSA or 4100 steps/d was equivalent to an increased risk of all-cause mortality from a daily intake of 103.4 g/d of red meat or 50 g/d of processed meat. The risk was further decreased as the number of steps per day increased, but the risk reversed when the MSA exceeded the threshold (39.5 min/week).

Conclusions: Adherence to physical activity is an effective way to reduce the risk of mortality due to meat intake. However, the total intake of red meat and processed meat should be controlled, especially the latter. Walking is recommended as the main daily physical activity of choice, while MSAs are preferred when time is limited, but it should be noted that longer MSAs do not provide additional benefits.

Keywords: all-cause mortality; cancer mortality; cardiovascular disease mortality; muscle-strengthening activities; processed meat; red meat; walking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram for search strategy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plots of meta-analyses of red and processed meat intake, daily steps, and MSA and all-cause mortality. (a) Red meat intake and all-cause mortality; (b) processed meat intake and all-cause mortality; (c) daily steps and all-cause mortality; (d) MSA and all-cause mortality.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Balanced associations between red and processed meat intake and muscle-strengthening activity and daily steps. (a) Meat intake, MSA, and all-cause mortality; (b) meat intake, MSA, and CVD mortality; (c) meat intake, MSA, and cancer mortality; (d) meat intake, daily steps, and all-cause mortality.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization NCD Mortality and Morbidity. [(accessed on 24 November 2022)];2017 Volume 18 Available online: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/topic-details/GHO/ncd-mo....
    1. Stewart C., Piernas C., Cook B., Jebb S.A. Trends in UK meat consumption: Analysis of data from years 1–11 (2008–09 to 2018–19) of the National Diet and Nutrition Survey rolling programme. Lancet Planet. Health. 2021;5:e699–e708. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00228-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zeng L., Ruan M., Liu J., Wilde P., Naumova E.N., Mozaffarian D., Zhang F.F. Trends in Processed Meat, Unprocessed Red Meat, Poultry, and Fish Consumption in the United States, 1999–2016. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2019;119:1085–1098.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.04.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Godfray H.C.J., Aveyard P., Garnett T., Hall J.W., Key T.J., Lorimer J., Pierrehumbert R.T., Scarborough P., Springmann M., Jebb S.A. Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science. 2018;361:eaam5324. doi: 10.1126/science.aam5324. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flegal K.M., Kit B.K., Orpana H., Graubard B.I. Association of All-Cause Mortality with Overweight and Obesity Using Standard Body Mass Index Categories: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013;309:71–82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.113905. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources