Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of hospital staff: An umbrella review of 44 meta-analyses
- PMID: 35576637
- PMCID: PMC9045868
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104272
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of hospital staff: An umbrella review of 44 meta-analyses
Abstract
Background: Hospital staff is at high risk of developing mental health issues during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the literature lacks an overall and inclusive picture of mental health problems with comprehensive analysis among hospital staff during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Objectives: To ascertain the prevalence of anxiety, depression and other mental health outcomes as reported in original articles among hospital staff during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Design: A PRISMA 2020 and MOOSE 2000 compliant umbrella review of published meta-analyses of observational studies evaluating the prevalence of mental health problems in hospital staff during the pandemic.
Review methods: Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO from December 1st, 2019, until August 13th 2021. The random effects model was used for the meta-analysis, and the I2 index was employed to assess between-study heterogeneity. Publication bias using Egger test and LFK index was examined. Data was analyzed using STATA 17.0 software. AMSTAR-2 was applied for the quality assessment of systematic reviews, while we used GRADE to rate the quality of evidence.
Results: Forty-four meta-analyses from 1298 individual studies were included in the final analysis, encompassing the prevalence of 16 mental health symptoms. One-third of hospital workers reported anxiety (Prevalence: 29.9%, 95% CI:27.1% to 32.7%) and depression (Prevalence: 28.4%, 95% CI:25.5% to 31.3%) symptomatology, while about 40% (95% CI: 36.9% to 42.0%) suffered from sleeping disorders. Fear-related symptoms, reduced well-being, poor quality of life, and acute stress symptoms had the highest prevalence among hospital staff. However, the quality of evidence in these areas varied from low to very low. Nurses suffered more often from sleep problems and symptoms of anxiety and depression than doctors, whereas doctors reported a higher prevalence of acute stress and post-traumatic disorders. The burden of anxiety, depression, and sleep disorders was higher among female employees than their male counterparts. Remarkably, acute stress and insomnia affected more than half of first-line medical staff.
Conclusions: The prevalence of mental health problems among hospital staff during the COVID-19 pandemic is generally high, with anxiety, depression and insomnia symptoms representing the most robust evidence based on a large dataset of prevalence meta-analyses. However, there is no strong confidence in the body of evidence for each outcome assessed.
Registration: Not registered.
Tweetable abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic is having a major impact on the mental health of hospital staff. The need for support must be different for nurses and doctors @eldi12345.
Keywords: COVID-19; Doctors; Health care; Hospital staff; Mental health; Meta-analysis; Nurses; Prevalence; Systematic review.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Prevalence of burnout and mental health problems among medical staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 20;13(7):e061945. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061945. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37474193 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 and common mental health symptoms in the early phase of the pandemic: An umbrella review of the evidence.PLoS Med. 2023 Apr 25;20(4):e1004206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004206. eCollection 2023 Apr. PLoS Med. 2023. PMID: 37098048 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Health care workers' mental health in the face of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2023 Jun;27(2):208-217. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2022.2101927. Epub 2022 Jul 23. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2023. PMID: 35875844 Review.
-
The prevalence of insomnia among health care workers amid the COVID-19 pandemic: An umbrella review of meta-analyses.J Psychosom Res. 2021 Oct;149:110597. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110597. Epub 2021 Aug 8. J Psychosom Res. 2021. PMID: 34388380 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Global prevalence of mental health problems among healthcare workers during the Covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Sep;121:104002. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104002. Epub 2021 Jun 13. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021. PMID: 34271460 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
How healthy are the healthcare staff in a rural health service? A cross-sectional study.Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Feb 24;6:100186. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100186. eCollection 2024 Jun. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024. PMID: 38746794 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and bidirectional association of sleep quality and gut health among Chinese midwives: a large population, multi-center cross-sectional study.Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 17;12:1368178. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1368178. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38694975 Free PMC article.
-
An ensemble model for predicting dispositions of emergency department patients.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Apr 22;24(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02503-5. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024. PMID: 38649949 Free PMC article.
-
Risk and protection factors of mental stress among medical staff in the third year of the COVID-19 pandemic.Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 22;15:1334552. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1334552. eCollection 2024. Front Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38585477 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of the Pandemic Grief Risk Factors and Its Relationship With Work-Related Stress and Grief Reaction Among Healthcare Workers Who Witnessed Patient Deaths.J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Mar 25;39(11):e102. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e102. J Korean Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 38529573 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alba A.C., Alexander P.E., Chang J., MacIsaac J., DeFry S., Guyatt G.H. High statistical heterogeneity is more frequent in meta-analysis of continuous than binary outcomes. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2016;70:129–135. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical