Infants' intention-based evaluations of distributive actions
- PMID: 35421629
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105429
Infants' intention-based evaluations of distributive actions
Abstract
Recent research revealed that infants attend to agents' intentions when they evaluate helping actions. The current study investigated whether infants also consider agents' intentions when they evaluate distributive actions. In Experiment 1, 9-month-old infants were first shown two failed attempts to perform a distribution. In the "failed equal distribution," the distributor first tried to reach one of the recipients to deliver an apple, failed, and then attempted to reach the other possible recipient to deliver a different apple and also failed. In the "failed unequal distribution," a different distributor always tried unsuccessfully to reach the same beneficiary. Then, in the test phase, infants were presented with the two distributors side by side, and infants' spontaneous preferential looking and reaching actions were recorded. We found a reliable preference for the equal distributor in both the visual and manual responses. Experiments 2 and 3 helped to rule out alternative explanations based on perceptual cues and affiliative biases. Overall, these findings suggest that infants' ability to evaluate distributive actions relies not only on the outcomes but also on the distributors' intentions.
Keywords: Distributive actions; Equality; Evaluation; Infancy; Intentionality; Sociomoral development.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Intention-based evaluations of distributive actions by 4-month-olds.Infant Behav Dev. 2023 Feb;70:101797. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2022.101797. Epub 2022 Dec 5. Infant Behav Dev. 2023. PMID: 36481727
-
Infants Consider the Distributor's Intentions in Resource Allocation.Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 30;11:596213. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.596213. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 33192941 Free PMC article.
-
Getting a grip on early intention understanding: The role of motor, cognitive, and social factors.Prog Brain Res. 2020;254:113-140. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 Jun 15. Prog Brain Res. 2020. PMID: 32859284 Review.
-
The Development of Infants' Sensitivity to Behavioral Intentions when Inferring Others' Social Preferences.PLoS One. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0135588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135588. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26383160 Free PMC article.
-
The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03702-1. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009. PMID: 19673160 Review.
Cited by
-
Toddlers Prefer Agents Who Help Those Facing Harder Tasks.Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Apr 10;8:483-499. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00129. eCollection 2024. Open Mind (Camb). 2024. PMID: 38665545 Free PMC article.
-
Common and distinct equity preferences in children and adults.Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 14;15:1330024. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1330024. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38420165 Free PMC article.
-
Editorial: Nature and determinants of socio-moral development: theories, methods and applications.Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 20;14:1296472. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1296472. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37928586 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Generalizing across moral sub-domains: infants bidirectionally link fairness and unfairness to helping and hindering.Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 20;14:1213409. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1213409. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37546446 Free PMC article.
-
Zhuangzi and collaboration in animals: a critical conceptual analysis of shared intentionality.Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 29;14:1170358. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1170358. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37457070 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical