Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 23;21(9):2967.
doi: 10.3390/s21092967.

Olfactory Detection of Toluene by Detection Rats for Potential Screening of Lung Cancer

Affiliations

Olfactory Detection of Toluene by Detection Rats for Potential Screening of Lung Cancer

Yunkwang Oh et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Early detection is critical to successfully eradicating a variety of cancers, so the development of a new cancer primary screening system is essential. Herein, we report an animal nose sensor system for the potential primary screening of lung cancer. To establish this, we developed an odor discrimination training device based on operant conditioning paradigms for detection of toluene, an odor indicator component of lung cancer. The rats (N = 15) were trained to jump onto a floating ledge in response to toluene-spiked breath samples. Twelve rats among 15 trained rats reached performance criterion in 12 consecutive successful tests within a given set, or over 12 sets, with a success rate of over 90%. Through a total of 1934 tests, the trained rats (N = 3) showed excellent performance for toluene detection with 82% accuracy, 83% sensitivity, 81% specificity, 80% positive predictive value (PPV) and 83% negative predictive value (NPV). The animals also acquired considerable performance for odor discrimination even in rigorous tests, validating odor specificity. Since environmental and long-term stability are important factors that can influence the sensing results, the performance of the trained rats was studied under specified temperature (20, 25, and 30 °C) and humidity (30%, 45%, and 60% RH) conditions, and monitored over a period of 45 days. At given conditions of temperature and humidity, the animal sensors showed an average accuracy within a deviation range of ±10%, indicating the excellent environmental stability of the detection rats. Surprisingly, the trained rats did not differ in retention of last odor discrimination when tested 45 days after training, denoting that the rats' memory for trained odor is still available over a long period of time. When taken together, these results indicate that our odor discrimination training system can be useful for non-invasive breath testing and potential primary screening of lung cancer.

Keywords: animal nose; detection rat; odor detection; olfactory behavior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of spiked breath sampling. (a) Sample preparation of toluene odor, (b) Exhaled breath from healthy individuals.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic diagram of the odor discrimination training device. (a) 3D-front view, (b) 3D-bird’s eye view of the training apparatus.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Four key steps for odor discrimination training. Step 1: odor injection. Step 2: odor recognition. Step 3: odor-dependent behavior. Step 4: implementation of reward/punishment.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Rat performance detecting toluene in spiked breath through a total of 1934 tests.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Analysis of environmental stability. (a) Temperature stability for a total of 1198 tests, (b) humidity stability for a total of 1247 tests. The performance of the trained rats (N = 3) was tested under different temperature (20, 25, and 30 °C) and humidity (30, 45, and 60% RH) conditions.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Measurement of long-term retention of olfactory discrimination. The odor detection performance of the trained rats (N = 3) was examined 45 days after the last discrimination training through a total of 129 tests. Base: Average test results for 1 week before long-term retention test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Oh Y., Lee Y., Heath J., Kim M. Applications of animal biosensors: A review. IEEE Sens. J. 2015;15:637–645.
    1. Ache B.W., Young J.M. Olfaction: Diverse species, conserved principles. Neuron. 2005;48:417–430. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jezierski T., Adamkiewicz E., Walczak M., Sobczyńska M., Gorecka-Bruzda A., Ensminger J., Papet E. Efficacy of drug detection by fully-trained police dogs varies by breed, training level, type of drug and search environment. Forensic Sci. Int. 2014;237:112–118. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.01.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lorenzo N., Wan T., Harper R.J., Hsu Y.L., Chow M., Rose S., Furton K.G. Laboratory and field experiments used to identify Canis lupus var. familiaris active odor signature chemicals from drugs, explosives, and humans. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003;376:1212–1224. doi: 10.1007/s00216-003-2018-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poling A., Weetjens B.J., Cox C., Beyene N.W., Bach H., Sully A. Using trained pouched rats to detect land mines: Another victory for operant conditioning. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 2011;44:351–355. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-351. - DOI - PMC - PubMed