Olfactory Detection of Toluene by Detection Rats for Potential Screening of Lung Cancer
- PMID: 33922694
- PMCID: PMC8123061
- DOI: 10.3390/s21092967
Olfactory Detection of Toluene by Detection Rats for Potential Screening of Lung Cancer
Abstract
Early detection is critical to successfully eradicating a variety of cancers, so the development of a new cancer primary screening system is essential. Herein, we report an animal nose sensor system for the potential primary screening of lung cancer. To establish this, we developed an odor discrimination training device based on operant conditioning paradigms for detection of toluene, an odor indicator component of lung cancer. The rats (N = 15) were trained to jump onto a floating ledge in response to toluene-spiked breath samples. Twelve rats among 15 trained rats reached performance criterion in 12 consecutive successful tests within a given set, or over 12 sets, with a success rate of over 90%. Through a total of 1934 tests, the trained rats (N = 3) showed excellent performance for toluene detection with 82% accuracy, 83% sensitivity, 81% specificity, 80% positive predictive value (PPV) and 83% negative predictive value (NPV). The animals also acquired considerable performance for odor discrimination even in rigorous tests, validating odor specificity. Since environmental and long-term stability are important factors that can influence the sensing results, the performance of the trained rats was studied under specified temperature (20, 25, and 30 °C) and humidity (30%, 45%, and 60% RH) conditions, and monitored over a period of 45 days. At given conditions of temperature and humidity, the animal sensors showed an average accuracy within a deviation range of ±10%, indicating the excellent environmental stability of the detection rats. Surprisingly, the trained rats did not differ in retention of last odor discrimination when tested 45 days after training, denoting that the rats' memory for trained odor is still available over a long period of time. When taken together, these results indicate that our odor discrimination training system can be useful for non-invasive breath testing and potential primary screening of lung cancer.
Keywords: animal nose; detection rat; odor detection; olfactory behavior.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8123061/bin/sensors-21-02967-g001.gif)
![Figure 2](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8123061/bin/sensors-21-02967-g002.gif)
![Figure 3](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8123061/bin/sensors-21-02967-g003.gif)
![Figure 4](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8123061/bin/sensors-21-02967-g004.gif)
![Figure 5](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8123061/bin/sensors-21-02967-g005.gif)
![Figure 6](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8123061/bin/sensors-21-02967-g006.gif)
Similar articles
-
Multi-Odor Discrimination by Rat Sniffing for Potential Monitoring of Lung Cancer and Diabetes.Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 26;21(11):3696. doi: 10.3390/s21113696. Sensors (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34073351 Free PMC article.
-
[Medical diagnosis by breath analysis: odor sensors].Med Sci (Paris). 2019 Feb;35(2):123-131. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2019001. Epub 2019 Feb 18. Med Sci (Paris). 2019. PMID: 30774079 Review. French.
-
An odor detection system based on automatically trained mice by relative go no-go olfactory operant conditioning.Sci Rep. 2015 May 6;5:10019. doi: 10.1038/srep10019. Sci Rep. 2015. PMID: 25944031 Free PMC article.
-
The perception of odor is not a surrogate marker for chemical exposure: a review of factors influencing human odor perception.Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013 Feb;51(2):70-6. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2013.767908. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013. PMID: 23387344 Review.
-
Odor discrimination and odor quality perception in rats with disruption of connections between the olfactory epithelium and olfactory bulbs.J Neurosci. 2002 May 15;22(10):4205-16. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-10-04205.2002. J Neurosci. 2002. PMID: 12019338 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Pancreatic Cancer and Detection Methods.Biomedicines. 2023 Sep 18;11(9):2557. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11092557. Biomedicines. 2023. PMID: 37760999 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hope for Ostomates: A Carbon and Zeolite Impregnated Polyester Fabric Inhibits Urine Odor in Cancer Patients: A Randomized Experimental Study.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Sep 1;22(9):2917-2921. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.9.2917. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021. PMID: 34582662 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Oh Y., Lee Y., Heath J., Kim M. Applications of animal biosensors: A review. IEEE Sens. J. 2015;15:637–645.
-
- Jezierski T., Adamkiewicz E., Walczak M., Sobczyńska M., Gorecka-Bruzda A., Ensminger J., Papet E. Efficacy of drug detection by fully-trained police dogs varies by breed, training level, type of drug and search environment. Forensic Sci. Int. 2014;237:112–118. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.01.013. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lorenzo N., Wan T., Harper R.J., Hsu Y.L., Chow M., Rose S., Furton K.G. Laboratory and field experiments used to identify Canis lupus var. familiaris active odor signature chemicals from drugs, explosives, and humans. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003;376:1212–1224. doi: 10.1007/s00216-003-2018-7. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical