Rising Prices of Targeted Oral Anticancer Medications and Associated Financial Burden on Medicare Beneficiaries
- PMID: 28471711
- PMCID: PMC5536165
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.3742
Rising Prices of Targeted Oral Anticancer Medications and Associated Financial Burden on Medicare Beneficiaries
Abstract
Purpose The high cost of oncology drugs threatens the affordability of cancer care. Previous research identified drivers of price growth of targeted oral anticancer medications (TOAMs) in private insurance plans and projected the impact of closing the coverage gap in Medicare Part D in 2020. This study examined trends in TOAM prices and patient out-of-pocket (OOP) payments in Medicare Part D and estimated the actual effects on patient OOP payments of partial filling of the coverage gap by 2012. Methods Using SEER linked to Medicare Part D, 2007 to 2012, we identified patients who take TOAMs via National Drug Codes in Part D claims. We calculated total drug costs (prices) and OOP payments per patient per month and compared their rates of inflation with general health care prices. Results The study cohort included 42,111 patients who received TOAMs between 2007 and 2012. Although the general prescription drug consumer price index grew at 3% per year over 2007 to 2012, mean TOAM prices increased by nearly 12% per year, reaching $7,719 per patient per month in 2012. Prices increased over time for newly and previously launched TOAMs. Mean patient OOP payments dropped by 4% per year over the study period, with a 40% drop among patients with a high financial burden in 2011, when the coverage gap began to close. Conclusion Rising TOAM prices threaten the financial relief patients have begun to experience under closure of the coverage gap in Medicare Part D. Policymakers should explore methods of harnessing the surge of novel TOAMs to increase price competition for Medicare beneficiaries.
Figures
![Fig 1.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5536165/bin/JCO.2017.72.3742f1.gif)
![Fig 2.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5536165/bin/JCO.2017.72.3742f2.gif)
![Fig 3.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5536165/bin/JCO.2017.72.3742f3.gif)
![Fig 4.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5536165/bin/JCO.2017.72.3742f4.gif)
Comment in
-
Cancer, Financial Burden, and Medicare Beneficiaries.J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;35(22):2461-2462. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.1877. Epub 2017 May 31. J Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28562166 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The Inflation Reduction Act: How Will Medicare Negotiating Drug Prices Impact Patients with Heart Disease?Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Jun;25(6):577-581. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01878-7. Epub 2023 Apr 25. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023. PMID: 37097432 Review.
-
Growing Financial Burden From High-Cost Targeted Oral Anticancer Medicines Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Cancer.JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Nov;18(11):e1739-e1749. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00171. Epub 2022 Sep 13. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022. PMID: 36099549 Free PMC article.
-
Financial Burden for Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Enrolled in Medicare Part D Taking Targeted Oral Anticancer Medications.J Oncol Pract. 2017 Feb;13(2):e152-e162. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.014639. Epub 2017 Jan 17. J Oncol Pract. 2017. PMID: 28095170 Free PMC article.
-
Mind the Gap: Why Closing the Doughnut Hole Is Insufficient for Increasing Medicare Beneficiary Access to Oral Chemotherapy.J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 1;34(4):375-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.7736. Epub 2015 Dec 7. J Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26644524 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in the prescription drug plans delivering the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Aug 1;64(15 Suppl 10):S3-6; quiz S21-S23. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070252. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007. PMID: 17646551 Review.
Cited by
-
Novel insights on multilevel factors that affect the dynamic course of financial toxicity in cancer patients.JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Feb 29;8(2):pkae020. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae020. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024. PMID: 38591964 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Cost-utility analysis of Palbociclib + letrozole and ribociclib + letrozole versus Letrozole monotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer in Iran using partitioned survival model.Health Econ Rev. 2023 Nov 9;13(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13561-023-00463-6. Health Econ Rev. 2023. PMID: 37943359 Free PMC article.
-
Editorial: Financial anxiety in cancer prevention and control.Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 16;14:1304079. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1304079. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37908816 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Use of Drugs in Clinical Practice and the Associated Cost of Cancer Treatment in Adult Patients with Solid Tumors: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.Curr Oncol. 2023 Aug 30;30(9):7984-8004. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30090580. Curr Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37754495 Free PMC article.
-
Opportunities for Savings in Risk Arrangements for Oncologic Care.JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Sep 1;4(9):e233124. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3124. JAMA Health Forum. 2023. PMID: 37713209 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sledge GW., Jr What is targeted therapy? J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1614–1615. - PubMed
-
- Aggarwal S. Targeted cancer therapies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:427–428. - PubMed
-
- Kircher SM, Meeker CR, Nimeiri H, et al. The parity paradigm: Can legislation help reduce the cost burden of oral anticancer medications? Value Health. 2016;19:88–98. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous