Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Apr;19(5):893-905.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980015002062. Epub 2015 Jul 6.

Red and processed meat consumption and mortality: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Affiliations
Review

Red and processed meat consumption and mortality: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Xia Wang et al. Public Health Nutr. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To examine and quantify the potential dose-response relationship between red and processed meat consumption and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality.

Design: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge, CINHAL, Scopus, the Cochrane library and reference lists of retrieved articles up to 30 November 2014 without language restrictions. We retrieved prospective cohort studies that reported risk estimates for all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality by red and/or processed meat intake levels. The dose-response relationships were estimated using data from red and processed meat intake categories in each study. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled relative risks and 95 % confidence intervals and to incorporate between-study variations.

Results: Nine articles with seventeen prospective cohorts were eligible in this meta-analysis, including a total of 150 328 deaths. There was evidence of a non-linear association between processed meat consumption and risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, but not for cancer mortality. For processed meat, the pooled relative risk with an increase of one serving per day was 1·15 (95 % CI 1·11, 1·19) for all-cause mortality (five studies; P<0·001 for linear trend), 1·15 (95 % CI 1·07, 1·24) for cardiovascular mortality (six studies; P<0·001) and 1·08 (95 % CI 1·06, 1·11) for cancer mortality (five studies; P<0·001). Similar associations were found with total meat intake. The association between unprocessed red meat consumption and mortality risk was found in the US populations, but not in European or Asian populations.

Conclusions: The present meta-analysis indicates that higher consumption of total red meat and processed meat is associated with an increased risk of total, cardiovascular and cancer mortality.

Keywords: Cohort studies; Meat; Meta-analyses; Mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Risk of (a) all-cause mortality, (b) cardiovascular mortality and (c) cancer mortality associated with each serving per day of processed meat. The study-specific relative risk (RR) and 95 % CI are represented by the black square and horizontal line, respectively; the area of the black square is proportional to the specific-study weight to the overall meta-analysis. The centre of the open diamond presents the pooled RR and its width represents the pooled 95 % CI. Weights are from random-effects analysis (F, female; M, male)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relative risk for (a) all-cause mortality, (b) cardiovascular mortality and (c) cancer mortality for highest v. lowest intake of unprocessed red meat. The study-specific relative risk (RR) and 95 % CI are represented by the black square and horizontal line, respectively; the area of the black square is proportional to the specific-study weight to the overall meta-analysis. The centre of the open diamond presents the pooled RR and its width represents the pooled 95 % CI. Weights are from random-effects analysis (F, female; M, male)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Risk of (a) all-cause mortality, (b) cardiovascular mortality and (c) cancer mortality associated with each serving per day of total meat. The study-specific relative risk (RR) and 95 % CI are represented by the black square and horizontal line, respectively; the area of the black square is proportional to the specific-study weight to the overall meta-analysis. The centre of the open diamond presents the pooled RR and its width represents the pooled 95 % CI. Weights are from random-effects analysis (F, female; M, male)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Speedy AW (2003) Global production and consumption of animal source foods. J Nutr 133, 11 Suppl. 2, 4048S–4053S. - PubMed
    1. Delgado CL (2003) Rising consumption of meat and milk in developing countries has created a new food revolution. J Nutr 133, 11 Suppl. 2, 3907S–3910S. - PubMed
    1. Daniel CR, Cross AJ, Koebnick C et al.. (2011) Trends in meat consumption in the USA. Public Health Nutr 14, 575–583. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walker P, Rhubart-Berg P, McKenzie S et al.. (2005) Public health implications of meat production and consumption. Public Health Nutr 8, 348–356. - PubMed
    1. Sinha R, Cross AJ, Graubard BI et al.. (2009) Meat intake and mortality: a prospective study of over half a million people. Arch Intern Med 169, 562–571. - PMC - PubMed