There wasn’t much to discuss for jurors deciding the fate of cop-killer Allan Cameron last week, one member of the panel told The Post.
“By the time we were in the jury room for 10 minutes, we were pretty much in unanimous agreement on it,” said a 54-year-old juror.
“I think we did our job, and I think things turned out equitably. None of us lost any sleep” over the decision late last week.
The jury took less than two hours to convict Cameron, 29, of gunning down Police Officer Dillon Stewart, 35, on Nov. 28, 2005, after the cop pulled the defendant over for running a red light.
The juror said the defense theory of a coverup for a friendly-fire incident fell flat. “Nobody considered the conspiracy theory,” he said. “It wasn’t even mentioned in the jury room.”
The juror said the panel did briefly consider whether Cameron meant for Stewart to die.
“Did he intend to kill?” the man said. “But when you shoot six times, that’s intent to kill. That discussion lasted about 20 seconds.”