[Skip to Navigation]
Special Communication
March 6, 2023

International Consensus Statement on the Radiological Screening of Contact Children in the Context of Suspected Child Physical Abuse

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neuroradiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • 2Developmental Biology and Cancer Section, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
  • 3Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
  • 4Department of Radiology, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • 5Department Radiology, Children’s Health Ireland and The National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  • 6Department of Radiology, Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil
  • 7Department of Radiology, Hong Kong Children’s Hospital, Hong Kong
  • 8Department of Radiology, Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  • 9City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York
  • 10Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children’s Hospital–Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • 11Te Puaruruhau, Starship Children’s Health, Auckland, New Zealand
  • 12Department of Pediatrics: Child and Youth Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • 13Department of Pediatrics, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • 14Department of Pediatrics, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom
  • 15Department of Pediatrics, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • 16Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • 17Department of Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
  • 18Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
  • 19Department of Radiology and Imaging, University Hospital of Heraklion, Medical School, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece
  • 20Department of Clinical Radiology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
  • 21Paris Saclay University, Faculty of Medicine, AP-HP, Bicêtre Hospital, Department of Paediatric Radiology, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
  • 22Department of Medical Imaging, Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
  • 23Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Emma Children’s Hospital–Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • 24Department of Forensic Medicine, Netherlands Forensic Institute, The Hague, the Netherlands
  • 25Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • 26Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
  • 27Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
  • 28Division of Population Medicine, Department of Child Health, University of Cardiff, Cardiff, United Kingdom
  • 29Department of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock
  • 30Department of Radiology, Sheffield Children’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • 31Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
JAMA Pediatr. 2023;177(5):526-533. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.6184
Abstract

Importance  Physical abuse is a common but preventable cause of long-term childhood morbidity and mortality. Despite the strong association between abuse in an index child and abuse in contact children, there is no guidance outlining how to screen the latter, significantly more vulnerable group, for abusive injuries. Consequently, the radiological assessment of contact children is often omitted, or variably performed, allowing occult injuries to go undetected and increasing the risk of further abuse.

Objective  To report an evidence-based and consensus-derived set of best practices for the radiological screening of contact children in the context of suspected child physical abuse.

Evidence Review  This consensus statement is supported by a systematic review of the literature and the clinical opinion of an internationally recognized group of 26 experts. The modified Delphi consensus process comprised 3 meetings of the International Consensus Group on Contact Screening in Suspected Child Physical Abuse held between February and June 2021.

Findings  Contacts are defined as the asymptomatic siblings, cohabiting children, or children under the same care as an index child with suspected child physical abuse. All contact children should undergo a thorough physical examination and a history elicited prior to imaging. Contact children younger than 12 months should have neuroimaging, the preferred modality for which is magnetic resonance imaging, and skeletal survey. Contact children aged 12 to 24 months should undergo skeletal survey. No routine imaging is indicated in asymptomatic children older than 24 months. Follow-up skeletal survey with limited views should be performed if abnormal or equivocal at presentation. Contacts with positive findings should be investigated as an index child.

Conclusions and Relevance  This Special Communication reports consensus recommendations for the radiological screening of contact children in the context of suspected child physical abuse, establishing a recognized baseline for the stringent evaluation of these at-risk children and providing clinicians with a more resilient platform from which to advocate for them.

Add or change institution
×