Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Robber fly, South Africa, 2012.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Robber fly, South Africa, 2012.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2014 at 19:18:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Julia W.
Support Julia\talk 19:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)- Support Graphium 20:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support The wide DoF is impressive. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:02, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Comment My opinion can be biased; but still believe it should be more detailed. (I agree that species level ID is difficult for them from mere photos.) Jee 03:32, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- More detailed photographically, or more detailed identification? If the latter, did you notice that this is identified to genus level? The Asilidae specialist who ID'd this said anything further than the species group would be unlikely without dissection. Julia\talk 05:20, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- Photographically. ID is enough. Jee 05:26, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- More detailed photographically, or more detailed identification? If the latter, did you notice that this is identified to genus level? The Asilidae specialist who ID'd this said anything further than the species group would be unlikely without dissection. Julia\talk 05:20, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support very good --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:54, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Oppose false focus layer: the fly eyes must be sharp. Otherwise a nice and interesting image. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:49, 14 June 2014 (UTC)- Comment Monotonous colors. Should be more detailed. There are excellent macro FPs. This is not even near. --70.39.185.56 13:57, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, {{{neutral}}} neutral → not featured. /Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 17:14, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
