Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Church of light.jpg

File:Church of light.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2022 at 15:42:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Church of light.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Church of light.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Iceland
•  Info created and uploaded by AstroAnthony - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 15:42, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:42, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:15, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:42, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

 Comment Beautiful photo ,but it needs a perspective improvement. On the left I see a street lamp and I can't imagine that it is really so crooked. --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:38, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Some small technical improvements could be made (perspective correction, plus there is some chromatic aberration) but such an amazing view that it should be FP for me. Cmao20 (talk) 22:47, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support perspective correction is not a necessity. The viewer is clearly looking upwards... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:42, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:07, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Karelj (talk) 10:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Lmbuga (talk) 11:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:03, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:58, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 19:26, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 00:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Magical realism!!--Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:43, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support It looks that the aurora were shot separately with different settings than the church. I trust that they were there. White balance is a little on the warm side but I think it's alright. But overall this picture is great. --Ximonic (talk) 14:33, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 06:55, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Startus (talk) 11:23, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I see some room for improvement in the processing, but still FP to me Poco a poco (talk) 16:55, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:46, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay 💬 19:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 15:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 17:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:09, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Aurora