Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brooks-schild.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

was tagged as speedy ("logo") by the photographer who's well known for several "fights" for GFDL-1.2-only and against Commons. Anyway, I don't see a valid reason for deletion in this case. It's a trivial text logo that is ineligible for copyrights (The company exists since 1866). So if we delete this image, we have to delete numerous comparable shots too. -- \mu/ 09:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

  •  Keep, text-only logo, clearly no copyright issue. –Tryphon 09:27, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Das hat absolut nichts mit GFDL zu tun. Ich möchte keinen Rechtsstreit mit der englischen Firma. Auf .de ist das wegen mangelnder SH auch abgesichert, im anglo-amerikanischen Raum mit dem (c)-Modell und ganz anderen Markenrechten sieht das anders aus. Um der Thematik GFDL 1.2-only in diesem Fall die Brisanz zu nehmen: Jedermann kann die Lizenz in CC oder gemeinfrei ändern, ganz nach Belieben. (Nur bitte nicht PD, das kann ich als Deutscher nicht. --Marcela (talk) 21:57, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • For whatever reason an anonymous user mentions the GFDL 1.2 issue in that case, it is a quite unqualified and unnecessary statement.
    Back to the image...  Keep, text only, no threshold of originality. --Eva K. is evil 22:46, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
hint for EvaK: Ralf stated there (third paragraph) that he will not requested regular deletion here, but two days ago he suddenly request speedy deletition, regardless his clear statement back in February. I only discovered this because I tagged some other files for deletion myself and checked the "speedy" category therefore. The little discussion with Ralf was a bit odd, that's why I mentioned the impression of his inconsistent behaviour that I got. He seems not to accept the existence of {{PD-textlogo}} on Commons. -- \mu/ 05:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Simple text logo, no need to delete. 3, 2, 1 .. keep (same non-problem as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rolleiflex-6008-rr-800.jpg) --85.183.214.234 08:53, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. PD-textlogo Yann (talk) 23:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]