Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bangladesh Scouts logo.png
This file was initially tagged by Arr4 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:18, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Keep If we assume that images such as File:WikiProject Scouting fleur-de-lis solid.svg are free and the scouting logo itself is free as well, this is ineligible for copyright IMHO. --PaterMcFly (talk) 09:20, 17 June 2015 (UTC)- Keep Fry1989 eh? 19:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as per foregoing. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
copyrighted. The Scouting logo is in fact not free, as mistakenly claimed in the earlier DR. The Scouting WikiProject logo was created to as to significantly differ from the original, so as not to violate copyright. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:14, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, per previous DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:22, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, per Commons:Threshold of originality examples, it makes a very good argument that this is too simple to display originality. Look at the Best Western logo - a red crown inside a blue shape that is more complex than a simple square and with gold around it, plus gold letters below the crown - is not considered to be copyrightable. A fleur de lis, inside a red circle with a red circle inside the fleur-de-lis is copyrightable? If it is then one could argue that anything involving simple green fleur-de-lis that is inside a red circle should be considered as derivative and violating. Which does not make any sense. Rybkovich (talk) 04:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Delete complex logo, and I did not find an evidence it's free [1] --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:48, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: while it could be below TOO in the US we don't have any evidence that the file is free in Bangladesh. Bangladesh was a part of the Dominion of Pakistan which is one of the legal successors of British-India. Therefor we have to assume that there is a low threshold in Bangladesh until proven otherwise. Natuur12 (talk) 15:50, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
