Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;44(12):810-813.
doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104997. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

How to read an ethics paper

Melanie Jansen  1   2 , Peter Ellerton  3
Affiliations

How to read an ethics paper

Melanie Jansen et al. J Med Ethics. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

In recent decades, evidence-based medicine has become one of the foundations of clinical practice, making it necessary that healthcare practitioners develop keen critical appraisal skills for scientific papers. Worksheets to guide clinicians through this critical appraisal are often used in journal clubs, a key part of continuing medical education. A similar need is arising for health professionals to develop skills in the critical appraisal of medical ethics papers. Medicine is increasingly ethically complex, and there is a growing medical ethics literature that modern practitioners need to be able to use in their practice. In addition, clinical ethics services are commonplace in healthcare institutions, and the lion's share of the work done by these services is done by clinicians in addition to their usual roles. Education to support this work is important. In this paper, we present a worksheet designed to help busy healthcare practitioners critically appraise ethics papers relevant to clinical practice. In the first section, we explain what is different about ethics papers. We then describe how to work through the steps in our critical appraisal worksheet: identifying the point at issue; scrutinising definitions; dissecting the arguments presented; considering counterarguments; and finally deciding on relevance. Working through this reflective worksheet will help healthcare practitioners to use the ethics literature effectively in clinical practice. We also intend it to be a shared evaluative tool that can form the basis of professional discussion such as at ethics journal clubs. Practising these critical reasoning skills will also increase practitioners' capacity to think through difficult ethical decisions in daily clinical practice.

Keywords: clinical ethics; education for health care professionals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al. . Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996;312:71–2. 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: the basics of evience-based medicine. 5 edn Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2014.
    1. Darzins PJ, Smith BJ, Heller RF. How to read a journal article. Med J Aust 1992;157:389–94. - PubMed
    1. Fox E, Myers S, Pearlman RA. Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: a national survey. Am J Bioeth 2007;7:13–25. 10.1080/15265160601109085 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Slowther AM, McClimans L, Price C. Development of clinical ethics services in the UK: a national survey. J Med Ethics 2012;38:210–4. 10.1136/medethics-2011-100173 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources